Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

“Tipi strani” e “mostriciattoli” nel diritto commerciale

novitàdigital “Tipi strani” e “mostriciattoli” nel diritto commerciale
Articolo
rivista JUS
fascicolo JUS - 2020 - 2-3
titolo “Tipi strani” e “mostriciattoli” nel diritto commerciale
“Weird Types” and “Scary Monsters” in Commercial Law
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 01-2021
doi 10.26350/004084_000093
issn 00226955 (stampa)
€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Starting from the three important writings of the seventies of the Twentieth century, which had an enormous influence on the subsequent doctrine of commercial law and which introduced the typological method in Italy as a reaction to the dogmatism of the jurisprudence, we propose to establish whether and what is their legacy nowadays. Little, except for some respectful but insincere quotes in the footnotes in many later essays. The typological method arose a reaction against the late Nineteenth Century’s dogmatism, but it did not replace it. Rather, lawmakers, courts and writers of commercial law tend to use this method arbitrarily, that is, outside of its real context: discussion, for the typological method, and decision, for the dogmatic reasoning. The unresolved conflict between the two methods and the inability to use them in their respective contexts explain many of the distortions and abuses of today’s legislation and court practices.

keywords

Legal theory, legal logic, typological method, commercial law, company law, contract law.