I precedenti giudiziari tra “obbligatorietà” e “persuasività”: note comparatistiche e riflessioni sparse a margine del nuovo c.p.c. brasiliano e della sua “sùmula vinculante”

digital

Articolo

rivista	JUS
fascicolo	JUS - 2020 - 2-3
titolo	I precedenti giudiziari tra “obbligatorietà” e “persuasività”: note comparatistiche e riflessioni sparse a margine del nuovo c.p.c. brasiliano e della sua “sùmula vinculante” The Judicial Precedents between “binding” and “persuasive” Force: comparative Notes and other Considerations with regard to the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure and its “Sùmula Vinculante”
autore	Marino Marinelli
editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	01-2021
doi	10.26350/004084_000096
issn	00226955 (stampa)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
The essay examines (and relativizes), from the perspective of comparative law, the traditional distinction between binding precedentes – typical of the common law legal systems – and persuasive precedents, which characterize on the contrary the civil law legal systems, with specific attention to the interesting institution of “sùmula vinculante” as provided for and regulated by the new Brazilian C.P.C. of 2015. keywords Judicial Precedents, Binding or Persuasive Force, Common Law, Civil Law, Brazil, Sùmula Vinculante.

Descrizione

The essay examines (and relativizes), from the perspective of comparative law, the traditional distinction between binding precedentes – typical of the common law legal systems – and persuasive precedents, which characterize on the contrary the civil law legal systems, with specific attention to the interesting institution of “sùmula vinculante” as provided for and regulated by the new Brazilian C.P.C. of 2015.