L’operazione è riuscita, ma cosa ne è del paziente? Le sentenze della Corte di giustizia in merito al Regolamento sulla condizionalità
|
digital
Articolo
€ 6,00
|
Articolo |
Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:
|
|
|
|
|
This article discusses the landmark judgments of the European Court of Justice of 16 February 2022 in the cases Hungary and Poland v. Parliament and Council. The judgments, which originated from two actions for annulment against the so-called Conditionality Regulation, bring about three important doctrinal novelties. First, they confirm the general validity of the so-called “horizontal conditionality”. Secondly, they affirm the existence of an “identity of the Union”. Thirdly, they recognize full legal nature to the values set out in Art. 2 TEU. Alongside these welcome developments, however, the judgments present some problematic aspects. This article argues that, following the Court’s rulings, the institutions will encounter several hurdles when implementing the Conditionality Regulation. So much so that this innovative piece of legislation might be at risk of losing its effet utile.
keywordsConditionality Regulation, horizontal conditionality, identity of the European Union, obligation as to the result to be achieved, primacy of EU law.Biografia dell'autoreSenior Research Fellow. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law di Heidelberg |
Consulta l'archivio
Ultimi 3 numeri
Annate disponibili online
20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995199419931992199119901989198819871986198519841983198219811980197919781977197619751974196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501943194219411940
