L’intelligenza artificiale e la proprietà intellettuale: le interferenze e la disciplina de iure condito e de iure condendo

Name: L’intelligenza artificiale e la proprietà intellettuale: le interferenze e la disciplina de iure condito e de iure condendo
Brand: Vita e Pensiero
Price: 6.00 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

novitàdigital L’intelligenza artificiale e la proprietà intellettuale:
le interferenze e la disciplina de iure condito e de iure condendo

Articolo

Rivista

JUS

Fascicolo

JUS - 2025 - 1

Titolo

L’intelligenza artificiale e la proprietà intellettuale: le interferenze e la disciplina de iure condito e de iure condendo

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: interference and regulation de iure condito and de iure condendo

Autore

Francesca Ferrari

Editore

Vita e Pensiero

Formato

Articolo |

Pdf

Pagine

Online da

07-2025

Doi

10.26350/004084_000187

Issn

0022-6955 (stampa)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione

The essay explores the complex intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law, analyzing the legal implications concerning both the data inputs used to train AI systems and the outputs they generate. Regarding training data, the essay examines the increasing legal disputes over the alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted materials as well as the legality of web scraping for training purposes and the applicability of text and data mining exceptions. Concerning AI-generated outputs, the essay addresses the challenge of securing IP rights, particularly copyright, highlighting the ‘‘human author’’ requirement. Moreover the Author takes into consideration the need to identify IP protection for works deriving from the use of artificial intelligence as a tool in the hand of the human creator. The essay analyzes also the European Union’s regulatory response through the AI Act, the ongoing development of Codes of Conduct under the AI Act and the proposed Italian domestic law on AI, which considers the protection of works created with AI tools if they result from the author’s intellectual work. In conclusion, the essay underscores the necessity of a balanced approach that safeguards IP rights while fostering AI development. It introduces the concept of machine unlearning as a potential technique to address data privacy and IP issues post-training. The author suggests that guiding principles may be more suitable than rigid rules for navigating the evolving relationship between AI and IP.